Security Risks

Many attacks begin with valid credentials, not malware.

Stolen or misused identities allow attackers to move through existing systems as apparently legitimate users. In complex IT estates, this can create attack paths that are difficult to identify.

RISK

ATTACK SURFACE

CENTREIDENTITY

Why identities are attractive to attackers.

Valid credentials use existing permissions and trusted authentication paths. Access can therefore resemble normal activity even when its purpose or context is unusual.

As enterprises become more complex, the number of identities, target systems and connections grows. Security must therefore consider identity, access and resources together.

Six risk areas

Compromised credentials

Valid credentials can enable access that appears technically legitimate. The relevant question is not only whether a sign-in occurs, but which systems and resources the identity can reach afterwards.

Why it matters

Existing permissions and trusted sign-in paths can make misuse more difficult to identify.

What IT leaders should consider

Assess critical accounts, their permissions and actual access paths together.

Privileged accounts

Administrative accounts often hold rights that extend far beyond individual applications. If compromised, central systems, configurations or additional identities may be affected.

Why it matters

The potential impact of misuse increases with the scope of permissions.

What IT leaders should consider

Identify administrative access, target resources and exceptional access situations.

Service accounts and technical identities

Technical accounts connect applications and systems. Because they can be long-lived and use different authentication mechanisms, their permissions and usage are often less transparent.

Why it matters

Service accounts represent a distinct access type and should not be treated like ordinary user accounts.

What IT leaders should consider

Establish transparency around the use, permissions and dependencies of technical identities.

Lateral movement

After initial access, existing permissions, trust relationships and technical dependencies can expose additional systems. Transitions between resources are therefore part of the security assessment.

Why it matters

Risk exists not only at the entry point, but along the possible paths through the environment.

What IT leaders should consider

Assess critical transitions between identities, systems and permission levels.

MFA gaps

MFA can significantly reduce the risk posed by stolen credentials. Coverage can still vary in complex environments, for example across legacy applications, on-premise systems or different protocols.

Why it matters

A general MFA policy does not establish which access paths are actually protected.

What IT leaders should consider

Review coverage, exceptions and critical sign-in paths separately.

Hybrid and legacy systems

On-premise infrastructure, cloud services and established applications do not always use the same identity and access patterns. This creates transitions that cannot be explained by a single rule or platform.

Why it matters

Complexity often lies in the connections between existing systems.

What IT leaders should consider

Assess cloud, on-premise and legacy applications along their actual access paths.

Connected view

Do not assess risks in isolation.

Identities, access and resources form a connected attack surface. Only their relationships reveal which paths are particularly relevant within a given infrastructure.

Assess your security risks with us.

In an initial consultation, we identify the risk areas and access paths that are particularly relevant in your environment.